• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Cardiac Arrest (1762); Death (1802); Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 05/28/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the autopulse platform was used on a male patient on the evening of (b)(6) 2015.A call was dispatched and when the medics arrived on scene, the patient was on the couch.Medics moved the patient onto the floor and began manual cpr (exact length of time was not provided).The patient was placed onto the autopulse platform and the device was deployed without any issues.The platform performed active operation without any issues all the way into the emergency room (er).The patient was pronounced at the emergency room with his family present.After the autopulse was removed, the presence of blood and compound rib fractures were observed.The medics never saw anything abnormal during their time with the patient.No device malfunctions reported.No further information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Zoll has not received the product in complaint.A supplemental report will be filed if and when the product is returned and investigation has been performed.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the customer on 06/19/2015, indicating that the patient was found lying in the supine position.Family members indicated that the patient had not feeling well all day and was experiencing difficulty breathing.Medics on scene observed that the patient had agonal respirations and no pulses.Therefore, cpr was initiated (exact length of time was not provided).The patient was moved from the couch onto the floor where the autopulse was applied.An elevation tube was inserted and placement was verified with an entitle co2 monitor as well as auscultation.An ekg monitor was also applied, which showed that the patient was in an asystolic state.An in squad io (intraosseous oxygen) was placed into the patient's right leg and two rounds of epinephrine and one round of atropine were administered.No changes with the patient's cardiac rhythm were observed.The platform performed active operation without any issues all the way into the emergency room (er).Patient was transported without incident or additional change in condition.Patient's care was transferred to the er staff.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform (s/n (b)(4)) was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation on 06/23/2015.Visual inspection of the returned platform was performed and no physical damages were observed.A lifeband was also returned for evaluation and visual inspection found that the liners were ripped at the connections to the hinged belt guard.A review of the platform's archive data was performed and found that no user advisories or warnings occurred on (b)(6) 2015.On the same day, it was observed that autopulse li-ion battery (21136) was used on a medium sized patient for a duration of more than 60 minutes and more than four thousand compression cycles with no faults or errors exhibited.When the platform was powered on the next day on the reported event date of (b)(6) 2015, a user advisory (ua) 45 (not at "home" after power-on/restart) message was displayed without the initiation of any compressions.Further inspection identified that the lifeband straps were not pulled completely out prior to turning the device on.Functional testing including a run_in test with a 95% patient test fixture was performed for several hours and no other user advisories or faults were exhibited.Load cell characterization testing was also performed, which found both load cells to be functioning within specification.The autopulse passed all final functional testing.The returned lifeband was also tested with a test autopulse platform and no functional issues or discrepancies were observed.In addition, the lifeband was deployed without any problems for approximately 60 minutes using a large resuscitation test fixture (lrtf) and no problems were found.The platform passed all testing criteria.Based on the investigation, no parts were identified for replacement.Based on the information received, the medics did not observe anything abnormal during the code.There were no device issues reported and the device evaluation did not identify any issues that may have caused or contributed to the outcome of the patient.Rib fractures and other injuries are a common but acceptable side-effect of cpr.They can be caused by manual cpr as well as with any method of mechanical cpr.In this case, the rib fractures could have happened due to manual cpr as well as during autopulse compressions or a combination of both.Additionally, in the american heart association (aha) and international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ilcor) 2010 guidelines, the vigorous application of chest compressions is a class 1 recommendation (standard of care) while recognizing the high rates of adverse events.The guidelines state that this is the appropriate trade off because the alternative to vigorous chest compression is certain death.Common training is that broken ribs are a normal, expected and even beneficial adverse event to the ultimate goal of resuscitation.Multiple physician experts in the field of resuscitation have concluded that adverse events resulting from the application of cpr are not likely to increase the rate of death.Note: according to 11 different published reports standard manual cpr complications occur at rates of 33% rib fracture, which are comparable to rates with use of autopulse.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key4860887
MDR Text Key5845218
Report Number3010617000-2015-00350
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/22/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0730-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/23/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/29/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MANUAL CPR
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-