• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK MITEK FMS TORNADO SHAVER HANDPIECE; ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK MITEK FMS TORNADO SHAVER HANDPIECE; ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 288022
Device Problems Unknown (for use when the device problem is not known) (2204); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Surgery, prolonged (2177); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/26/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The following information was received from the call center report on (b)(6) 2015 and summarized by a mitek complaint analyst; the customer is complaining about: when the tornado shaver was plugged in the system switched off.The physician didn¿t have another tornado shaver.The surgeon completed the procedure without the fms tornado shaver or any depuy synthes mitek equipment, causing a delay longer than 30 minutes.The patient was not adversely affected and is reported to be fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts have been made to retrieve additional information about the event and device.The additional information will reportedly be forwarded to depuy synthes mitek however it is not known if it will be received within the 30 day reporting requirement, therefore depuy synthes mitek would like to file this initial medwatch report at this time.When and if additional information is received it will be reflected in a follow-up medwatch report.In transit.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual and functional testing revealed no anomies and the unit passed all tests with acceptable results.Further a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints for this device's serial number.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
The following information was received from the call center report on 5-28-15 and summarized by a mitek complaint analyst; the customer is complaining about: when the tornado shaver was plugged in the system switched off.The physician didn't have another tornado shaver.The surgeon completed the procedure without the fms tornado shaver or any depuy synthes mitek equipment, causing a delay longer than 30 minutes.The patient was not adversely affected and is reported to be fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITEK FMS TORNADO SHAVER HANDPIECE
Type of Device
ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
eric so
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8003824682
MDR Report Key4869450
MDR Text Key6042543
Report Number1221934-2015-00843
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K954465
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor,company repres
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/25/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number288022
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/22/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/28/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/28/2015
Date Manufacturer Received05/28/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-