• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CRYOLIFE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CRYOLIFE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number HERO 1001
Device Problems Complete Blockage (1094); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Hyperplasia (1906); Thrombosis (2100); No Information (3190)
Event Date 01/03/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
According to the field assurance notification form, "only heard information that there had been 3 revisions on patients who previously received a hero graft.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the report, "only heard information that there had been 3 revisions on patients who previously received a hero graft." additional information was received which indicated the hospital had "performed five hero graft implantations in five patients.We have performed five revisions in four patients." this report represents the first of four patients.According to the surgeons, "the first patient that received the hero graft was a (b)(6) year old woman, [lot numbers] hero 1001 h14vc041, [hero] 1002 h14av015, [hero] 1003 h14ak005.Implantation was performed on the (b)(6) 2014 [(b)(6) 2014], the first revision for graft thrombosis was on (b)(6) 2015 [(b)(6) 2015], the second also for graft thrombosis on (b)(6) 2015 [(b)(6) 2015].It is our impression that the thrombosis was due to intimal hyperplasia at the titanium connector between the eptfe prosthesis and the venous outflow component of the hero graft." this medwatch is submitted for product code hero 1001; however, all product codes were investigated.The manufacturing records for lots h14vc041, h14av015, and h14ak005 were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.A review was performed of the available information.At this time, the role of the hero graft in these revisions cannot be determined with the available information, although graft revision/replacement is an established treatment for arteriovenous (av) graft complications.Thrombosis is the most common cause of vascular access dysfunction.Thrombosis is a known potential complication of the hero graft and adequate precautions and warnings are provided in the instructions for use (ifu).The risk of thrombosis is influenced by compliance with hemodialysis schedule and patient medical history.For example, hypercoagulability states or inadequately maintained anticoagulation therapy could contribute to an increased risk of thrombosis.Precautions regarding inadequate anticoagulation are provided in the ifu.Medical history was not available for these cases of thrombosis/revision.For these 4 cases of thrombosis in 3 patients, the surgeon believed the thrombosis was "due to intimal hyperplasia at the titanium connector." operative notes for the original hero implant procedures and the revisions were not available; details on the exact revision performed in each case are therefore unknown.Samples were also not received and it cannot be determined if intimal hyperplasia was the cause of the thrombosis events.At this time, the cause of the intimal hyperplasia and the following thrombosis events are unknown as the details of the cases are largely unavailable.
 
Event Description
According to the report, "only heard information that there had been 3 revisions on patients who previously received a hero graft." additional information was received which indicated the hospital had "performed five hero graft implantations in five patients.We have performed five revisions in four patients." this report represents the first of four patients.According to the surgeons, "the first patient that received the hero graft was a (b)(6) year old woman, [lot numbers] hero 1001 h14vc041, [hero] 1002 h14av015, [hero] 1003 h14ak005.Implantation was performed on the (b)(6) 2014 [(b)(6) 2014], the first revision for graft thrombosis was on (b)(6) 2015 [(b)(6) 2015], the second also for graft thrombosis on (b)(6) 2015 [(b)(6) 2015].It is our impression that the thrombosis was due to intimal hyperplasia at the titanium connector between the eptfe prosthesis and the venous outflow component of the hero graft." this medwatch is submitted for product code hero 1001; however, all product codes were investigated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HERO GRAFT
Type of Device
VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CRYOLIFE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer (Section G)
CRYOLIFE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer Contact
sandra o'reilly
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw, GA 30144
7704193355
MDR Report Key4884773
MDR Text Key6063689
Report Number1063481-2015-00104
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K124039
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/01/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberHERO 1001
Device Lot NumberH14VC041
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/12/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-