• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS PMTA ACCU2I INTERMEDIATE APPLICATOR; MICROWAVE APPLICATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS PMTA ACCU2I INTERMEDIATE APPLICATOR; MICROWAVE APPLICATOR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 900-602
Device Problems Bent (1059); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/01/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported (b)(6) 2015, an (b)(6), male patient presented for an microwave procedure of the liver.During the procedure, when the treating physician withdrew the applicator to reposition, the physician noted the tip of the applicator probe appeared to be bent and partially detached.The device was set aside and the procedure was aborted.There was no report of patient harm or injury due to this event.It was reported the disposable device is available for return the manufacturer.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported defective device has yet to be returned to the manufacturer for a device evaluation.The firm is attempting to obtain the device.An investigation into the root cause for product problem is currently in progress.The results of the device evaluation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.A review of the device history records was performed for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Returned for evaluation was one used pmta accu2i standard applicator.A visual examination noted that the tip of the applicator was bent at a 45 degree angle.Testing could not be performed due to the condition of the returned device.The customer's reported complaint description of the tip of the applicator becoming damaged is confirmed.Although the exact root cause of the event is unable to be determined, it does not appear to be the result of a manufacturing failure.A possible contributing factor could have been handling damage; i.E.Lateral forces on the applicator tip.A review of the device history records was performed for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Complaint # (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PMTA ACCU2I INTERMEDIATE APPLICATOR
Type of Device
MICROWAVE APPLICATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS
queensbury NY
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS
603 queensbury ave.
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
dan anderson
603 queensbury ave.
queensbury, NY 12804
5187981215
MDR Report Key4890615
MDR Text Key6834175
Report Number1319211-2015-00299
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NEY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K122762
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,user facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/29/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number900-602
Device Lot Number15080351
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/18/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age80 YR
-
-