• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CRYOLIFE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CRYOLIFE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number HERO 1001
Device Problems Complete Blockage (1094); Occlusion Within Device (1423)
Patient Problems Thrombosis (2100); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
According to the notification form received on 9th of july 2015 a cryolife representative was copied in an email from mr.(b)(6) to another surgeon which described mr.(b)(6) experience of the hero to date.Within that email the surgeon mentions that all the patients so far all have 6 months latency and one is over 1 year."the remaining" had few successful thrombectomies.He also mentions that he had to change the graft segment of one of them recently.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the notification form received on 9th of july 2015 a cryolife representative was copied in an email from mr.(b)(6) to another surgeon which described mr.(b)(6) experience of the hero to date.Within that email the surgeon mentions that all the patients so far all have 6 months patency and one is over 1 year."the remaining" had few successful thrombectomies.He also mentions that he had to change the graft segment of one of them recently.Although this medwatch is submitted for product code hero 1001, both product codes hero 1001 and hero 1002 were investigated.Multiple attempts were made to gather additional information from the surgeon; however, all attempts were unsuccessful.Lot numbers could not be determined as dates of implant were not known.A review was performed of the available information.This is a case of patients who required a thrombectomy at some point following hero graft implant.One patient required the surgeon to "change the graft segment." it is unclear if the graft revision was due to occlusion.Thrombosis is the most common cause of vascular access dysfunction; partial stenosis or full occlusion of prosthesis or vasculature is listed as a potential complication in the hero instructions for use (ifu).The following information was not reported for these cases: implant or intervention operative notes, patient history, dialysis compliance, and medication history.Individual risk of thrombosis events cannot be considered without additional information.Certain risk factors, such as missed hemodialysis sessions, can significantly increase the number of thrombosis episodes in arteriovenous fistulas (avfs) and arteriovenous grafts (avgs).Additionally, hypercoagulability states or inadequately maintained anticoagulation therapy could contribute to an increase risk of thrombosis.Precautions regarding inadequate anticoagulation are provided in the ifu.At this time, the specific relationship between the hero graft and the reported thrombectomies cannot be assessed with additional information.The ifu lists the following potential complications with the use of the hero graft: vascular graft revision/replacement and partial stenosis or full occlusion of prosthesis or vasculature.The ifu states "as with conventional grafts, hero graft may occlude in patients with insufficient anticoagulation or non-compliance with anticoagulation medication" and "utilizing a standard vessel loop, expose the artery and verify the internal diameter (id) is greater than 3mm in size.Verify patency via doppler or tactile feel.Use of the hero graft was clinically studied utilizing the brachial artery.Arterial implantation of the device to other arteries has not been studied and may increase the risk of adverse events not encountered in the clinical trial.However, identification of an alternative artery with an if of 3mm or greater may result in improved blood flow compared to a brachial artery with an if of less than 3mm." the root cause for the reported event is unknown; however, thrombosis and graft revision are known potential complications of the hero graft.
 
Event Description
According to the notification form received on 9th of july 2015 a cryolife representative was copied in an email from mr.(b)(6) to another surgeon which described mr.(b)(6) experience of the hero to date.Within that email the surgeon mentions that all the patients so far all have 6 months patency and one is over 1 year."the remaining" had few successful thrombectomies.He also mentions that he had to change the graft segment of one of them recently.Although this medwatch is submitted for product code hero 1001, both product codes hero 1001 and hero 1002 were investigated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HERO GRAFT
Type of Device
VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CRYOLIFE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer (Section G)
CRYOLIFE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer Contact
sandra o'reilly
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw, GA 30144
7704193355
MDR Report Key4919482
MDR Text Key6026695
Report Number1063481-2015-00113
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K124039
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberHERO 1001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/09/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-