W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number PLC161400J |
Device Problems
Leak/Splash (1354); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Unintended Collision (1429)
|
Patient Problem
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
|
Event Date 06/16/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm using gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses (b)(4).The stent grafts were deployed in a crossing-leg fashion, and an intra-procedure imaging revealed a suspected proximal type i endoleak.Two aortic extender components were implanted to treat the endoleak, and the procedure was concluded with the endoleak almost all resolved.On (b)(6) 2015, a follow-up imaging revealed a persistent endoleak.When the physician reviewed intra-procedure images taken during the initial procedure, it was revealed that the ipsilateral leg of the (b)(4) had been deployed, pushing up the (b)(4), which had caused it to be almost detached from the contralateral gate.Also, it was revealed that the persistent endoleak was a type iii endoleak.On (b)(6) 2015, another contralateral leg component was implanted to bridge the contralateral gate and the detached (b)(4).The type iii endoleak was resolved, and the patient tolerated the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The review of the manufacturing paperwork verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Describe event or problem additional information was obtained and the event description was corrected.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm using gore excluder aaa endoprostheses (rlt231418j/13549906 and plc161400j/13272921).The stent grafts were deployed in a crossing-leg fashion, and an intra-procedure imaging revealed a suspected proximal type i endoleak.Two aortic extender components were implanted to treat the endoleak, and the procedure was concluded with the endoleak almost all resolved.On (b)(6) 2015, a follow-up imaging revealed a persistent endoleak.When the physician reviewed intra-procedure images taken during the initial procedure, it was revealed that the ipsilateral leg of the rlt231418j had been deployed, pushing the plc161400j outward, which had caused it to be almost detached from the contralateral gate.Also, it was revealed that the persistent endoleak was a type iii endoleak.On (b)(6) 2015, another contralateral leg component was implanted to bridge the contralateral gate and the detached plc161400j.The type iii endoleak was resolved, and the patient tolerated the procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|