(b)(4).Method: visual inspection; functional inspection; device history review; complaint history review; risk assessment; results: manufacturing records were reviewed for the corresponding lot and no relevant issues were identified.The returned pa screw was attempted to be assembled with a blocker could not be.The inspection revealed deformation on the threads as well as discoloration.Furthermore, the tulip was confirmed to be splayed.Both of these conditions suggest that the initial blocker inserted was cross threaded.This is supported by the deformation observed on one of the returned blockers.Conclusion: the most likely cause of the customer reported event is improper insertion of the blocker leading to cross threading and deformation of the tulip threads.
|