• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NEUROPACE, INC. NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NEUROPACE, INC. NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number RNS NEUROSTIMULATOR
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980)
Event Date 06/12/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
(b)(6) 2014 patient implanted with rns system including a neurostimulator, a depth lead (dl-330-10) placed in the left mesial temporal region, a cortical strip lead (cl-325-10) placed mid temporal region and two additional cortical leads (cl-325-10) placed in the temporal region that are not currently connected.(b)(6) 2015 programming was modified.(b)(6) 2015 dr.(b)(6) emailed reporting that patient contacted his office because he was "feeling brief shocks on left side of head where device is." (b)(6), (b)(6) and (b)(6) 2015 patient reported that during physical therapy he was receiving external stimulation to help treat his arthritis/stiffness/pain in his legs, back and neck.These dates correspond to artifacts observed in the ecogs.(b)(6) 2015 programming was modified - he was seen by dr.(b)(6).During stim testing, dr.(b)(6) was able to reproduce the shocking sensation when testing burst 2 that was programmed as lead to lead with the hippocampus depth lead programmed as '+' and the mid temporal basal strip lead programmed as '-'.Dr.(b)(6) reprogrammed the patient with a bipolar configuration on the mid temporal basal strip and decreased the current on this lead.Patient did not report any shocking sensation when stim testing was done at this new setting.Patient was also told that he should not have external stim done again.(b)(6) 2015 dr.(b)(6) nurse emailed saying patient is "still having shocks." (b)(6) 2015 event reported to neuropace product monitoring and complaint file initiated.Note that physicians thought prior to (b)(6) 2015 that the stimulation was due to the physical therapy stimulation which has been determined to be tens treatment.Patient has also been doing very well from an epilepsy standpoint.No seizures reported at last appointment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device remians implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM
Type of Device
NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
NEUROPACE, INC.
455 n. bernardo ave.
mountain view CA 94043
Manufacturer (Section G)
NEUROPACE, INC.
455 n. bernardo ave.
mountain view CA 94043
Manufacturer Contact
ramona gonis
455 n. bernardo ave.
mountain view, CA 94043
6502382788
MDR Report Key4929809
MDR Text Key21795019
Report Number3004426659-2015-00021
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100026
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/20/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/21/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberRNS NEUROSTIMULATOR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/12/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-