• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. XENMATRIX; PORCINE SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. XENMATRIX; PORCINE SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1161015
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 05/07/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The following is based on medical record review: implant of a bard/davol xenmatrix graft (mesh #1) for repair of an incisional hernia developed following previous weight loss surgery.(no operative report provided) implant of an unknown synthetic mesh for repair of a peri umbilical hernia.(not operative report provided) (b)(6) 2014 - implant of a bard phasix mesh (mesh #2) for repair of a recurrent upper midline incisional hernia and excisional debridement of foreign body suture granulomatous abdominal wall abscess tissue.(b)(6) 2015 - due to an abdominal wall infection the patient underwent the explant of the bard/davol xenmatrix graft, the unknown synthetic mesh and the bard/davol phasix mesh.Operative details note "the phasix mesh specifically was not incorporated into the abdominal wall." the abdominal wall infection was noted to be most likely related to the previously placed unknown synthetic mesh implant.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on medical record review it appears that the abdominal wall infection can be associated to the unknown synthetic mesh.The explant operative report notes the abdominal wall infection was most likely related to the previously placed unknown synthetic mesh implant.Regarding infection the ifu states "if an infection develops, treat the infection aggressively.Consideration should be given regarding the removal of the mesh.An unresolved infection may require removal of the device." without a lot number a review of the manufacturing records could not be conducted.At this time, a definitive conclusion cannot be made as to the degree to which the implanted graft may have caused or contributed to the patient's abdominal wall infection.If additional information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.This mdr represents the xenmatrix graft (mesh #1) implanted on an unknown date.A separate mdr was sent to document phasix mesh (mesh #2) implanted on (b)(6) 2014.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XENMATRIX
Type of Device
PORCINE SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC.
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
steven figueroa
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258460
MDR Report Key4949480
MDR Text Key16850859
Report Number1213643-2015-00261
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTM
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K081272
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,study
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/29/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1161015
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received08/14/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-