• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. SUTUREFIX UL ANR XL W/1 #2 ULTRABRIAD BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. SUTUREFIX UL ANR XL W/1 #2 ULTRABRIAD BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72203841
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/26/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
During a hip arthroscopy using the suturefix ul anr xl w/1 #2 ultrabraid bl it was reported that one of the forks tines on the inserter broke.The all suture anchor was removed and a 2.3 was implanted in its place.The location of the broken tine is unknown.The surgeon took c-arm images to ensure the tine was not in the patient.Also, the surgeon took arthroscopic images of the 1.7 drill hole after the all suture anchor was removed to conform the tine was not in the drill hole.A backup device was available to complete the procedure.There was no reported procedural delay.The patient¿s post-operative condition was status quo.The site was prepped with standard 1.7 suturefix technique.The suture anchor had not been rotated after insertion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that one of the nitinol fork tines on the inserter of the suturefix ultra suture anchor xl broke off.The returned device was visually inspected, and the fork was confirmed to be broken.In addition to visual inspection, the part was inspected for tine thickness and width, and the material was analyzed.The dimensions were found to be within specification, and the material was confirmed to be nitinol.Further failure analysis was conducted by ((b)(4)) using scanning electron microscopy (sem).Through their analysis, it was determined that the sample ¿failed from overload¿, and that there ¿were no indications of faulty raw material, poor workmanship, or preexisting damage¿.Per ifu 10601059: ¿use of excessive force during insertion can cause failure of the suture anchor or insertion device (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUTUREFIX UL ANR XL W/1 #2 ULTRABRIAD BL
Type of Device
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes boulevard
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes boulevard
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
james gonzales
150 minuteman road
andover, MA 01810
5123585706
MDR Report Key4960282
MDR Text Key18640764
Report Number1219602-2015-00652
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122059
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/27/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/03/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number72203841
Device Lot Number50482867
Other Device ID Number200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/11/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/28/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/15/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age19 YR
-
-