• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC BIPAP FOCUS NONINVASIVE VENTILATOR SYSTEM; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, NON-LIFE-SUPPORTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC BIPAP FOCUS NONINVASIVE VENTILATOR SYSTEM; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, NON-LIFE-SUPPORTING Back to Search Results
Device Problems No Audible Alarm (1019); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Correct contact address: (b)(4).A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
The international customer reported no audio alarm and the backup alarm buzzer capacitor failed.There was no patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPAP FOCUS NONINVASIVE VENTILATOR SYSTEM
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, NON-LIFE-SUPPORTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC
2271 cosmos court
carlsbad CA 92011
Manufacturer Contact
betty harris
2271 cosmos court
carlsbad, CA 92011
MDR Report Key4990008
MDR Text Key23800734
Report Number2031642-2015-01520
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K053168
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Report Date 07/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/11/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/16/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2006
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-