Evaluation method - (b)(4)- (actual device tested).Results - (b)(4)- loss of power.Conclusion - (b)(4)- device repaired and returned.(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial flutter procedure with a coolflow® irrigation pump and experienced problems to deactivate high flow rate when coming off ablation.The system did not display an error message at the time the issue was presented.The procedure was completed by manually changing the flow rate without patient consequence.This event is being reported because inability to deactivate the high flow rate could potentially lead to patient volume overload.The investigational analysis has been completed.The device was evaluated and pump did not turn on.Fuses were out of the holder.Checked and reseated internal connections, reseated fuses in the fuse holder fixed the issue.The device was subjected to preventive maintenance (pm), safety and functional testing and all tests passed.No malfunction found on device.The device history record (dhr) review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The customer complaint was confirmed.Management is notified of failure analysis through the monthly trending reports.No statistical trends have been identified at this time; therefore, no capa has been requested.
|