• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS EXPANDABLE INTRODUCER SHEATH, 18R; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS EXPANDABLE INTRODUCER SHEATH, 18R; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 918ES26
Device Problems Material Frayed (1262); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/16/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The expandable sheath was returned for evaluation.During visual inspection, the distal tip was damaged, majority of the sheath liner was unexpanded; however, approximately 0.5 inches of the liner at the distal tip was expanded.No dimensional or functional testing was performed due to the condition of the returned device (sheath tip opened and expanded).The sheaths undergo multiple 200% inspections during manufacturing.These inspections support a conclusion that it is unlikely a manufacturing non-conformance was the cause of the complaint.The complaint was confirmed, however, no manufacturing non-conformances were identified.As reported, the physicians felt that the incision was not big enough to accommodate the insertion of the sheath.¿ these factors along with any local concentrations of calcification and/or tortuosity not appreciable on pre-procedural imaging can contribute to such issues.Available information suggests that patient/procedural factors (vessel calcification/tortuosity, size of incision site) may have contributed to the event.The ifu and the thv training manual instructs on procedural considerations for sheath insertion with regards to proper screening and contraindications.The training manual instructs the operator on proper sheath insertion and withdrawal techniques, including pre-dilating the vessel with the edwards dilators.It also notes that calcification may reduce lumen diameter and limit or prevent transfemoral passage of the devices.Pre-procedure screening and assessment of the femoral/iliac artery internal diameters will enable the clinician to determine if the sapien valve can be delivered transfemorally.Assessment of location and amount of circumferential calcium will aid in determining areas of reduced vessel diameters.The operators are trained to measure minimum vessel diameter taking calcium into account.The physician training manual also lists the minimum recommended vessel size for each size device.Per report, the physicians felt that the incision was not big enough to accommodate the insertion of the sheath.The sheath could have been getting caught on the incision (skin).The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.Method: (b)(4); manufacturing review.Result: (b)(4): operational problem.Conclusion: (b)(4): human factors.
 
Event Description
During a transfemoral procedure, the 18fr esheath could not be advanced into the patient.It appeared that sheath could not be inserted past the incision.After removing the esheath a "flap" at the end of the seam was noted.There was no injury to the patient.A new esheath was inserted and the procedure was completed.Two dilators a 16fr and 18fr were inserted without any difficulty.The patient's access vessel minimum luminal diameter (mld) was measured at 7.0mm.The vessel was mildly calcified and no tortuosity was reported.As per report, the physicians felt that the incision was not big enough to accommodate the insertion of the sheath; the sheath could have been getting caught on the incision (skin).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS EXPANDABLE INTRODUCER SHEATH, 18R
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
frances preston
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492505190
MDR Report Key5005231
MDR Text Key23118235
Report Number2015691-2015-02064
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Report Date 06/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/14/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2016
Device Model Number918ES26
Device Lot Number59725574
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/13/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/12/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/04/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
-
-