• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS FREEDOM STD FACE LINER SZ 24; PROSTHESIS, HIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS FREEDOM STD FACE LINER SZ 24; PROSTHESIS, HIP Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 01/05/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.Review of device history records show that lot released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.There are warnings in the package insert that state that this type of event can occur: under possible adverse effects, number 1 states, "material sensitivity reactions." number 2 states, ¿early or late postoperative, infection, and allergic reaction.¿ this report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff¿s complaint, and the allegations contained therein are unverified.This report is number 2 of 3 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 1825034-2015-03689 / 03690 / 03691).
 
Event Description
Legal counsel for patient reported that patient underwent left total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2004.Patient's legal counsel further reports that a revision procedure took place on (b)(6) 2015 due to patient allegations of infection and a pseudotumor.The patient was alleged to have received temporary prosthetics during the revision procedure.Review of invoice history confirmed the initial surgery date and that a revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2015.The modular head was removed and replaced with a constrained head and acetabular liner during the revision procedure.This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiffcomplaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.This report is number 2 of 4 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 1825034-2015-03689 / 2015-03690 / 2015-03691 / 2016-01088).Not returned by attorney.
 
Event Description
Legal counsel for patient reported that patient underwent left total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2004.Patient's legal counsel further reports that a revision procedure took place on (b)(6) 2015 due to patient allegations of infection and a pseudotumor.The patient was alleged to have received temporary prosthetics during the revision procedure.Review of invoice history confirmed the initial surgery date and that a revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2015.The modular head was removed and replaced with a constrained head and acetabular liner during the revision procedure.This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff's complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.Additional information received reported metal on metal wear as an additional reason for revision.It was further reported that patient underwent a reimplantation procedure on (b)(6) 2015.The procedure was completed with competitor product.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.
 
Event Description
Legal counsel for patient reported that patient underwent left total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2004.Patient's legal counsel further reports that a revision procedure took place on (b)(6) 2015 due to patient allegations of infection and a pseudotumor.The patient was alleged to have received temporary prosthetics during the revision procedure.Review of invoice history confirmed the initial surgery date and that a revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2015.The modular head was removed and replaced with a constrained head and acetabular liner during the revision procedure.This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff's complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.Additional information received reported metal on metal wear as an additional reason for revision.It was further reported that patient underwent a reimplantation procedure on (b)(6) 2015.The procedure was completed with competitor product.Operative report received for (b)(6) 2015 revision procedure noted osteolysis, loosening of the acetabular component, infection and the removal of a pseudotumor.During the procedure, all components were removed and replaced.A competitor stem was used, and the constrained liner was cemented directly into the patient's acetabulum.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREEDOM STD FACE LINER SZ 24
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
megan haas
56 e. bell drive
warsaw, IN 46582
5743726700
MDR Report Key5019104
MDR Text Key23627625
Report Number0001825034-2015-03690
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK030047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/20/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/31/2019
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number11-107323
Device Lot Number970570
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/19/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-