• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER GMBH INVERSE/REVERSE SCREW SYSTEM, 4.5-30; ZIMMER TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER GMBH INVERSE/REVERSE SCREW SYSTEM, 4.5-30; ZIMMER TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 01.04223.030
Device Problems Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/05/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer did not receive devices for review.Where lot numbers were received for the devices, the device history records were reviewed and found to be conforming.A cause for this specific event cannot be ascertained from the information provided.Should additional information become available and an investigation result be available, that changes this assessment, an amended medical device report will be submitted.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was implanted a inverse/reverse screw system, 4.5-30 on (b)(6) 2014.The patient described a clunking noise and indicated it hindered movement.The surgeon and the patient decided to revise the shoulder.During the revision on (b)(6) 2015 it was determined that the poly had dislodged.The screws were not removed during the revision.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During the trend analysis no trend was identified.The compatibility check was performed from surgical technique lit.No.06.01276.012 and showed that the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet.Review of incoming information : the patient described a "clunking" noise and indicated it hindered movement.Dr.(b)(6) and the patient decided to revise the shoulder.During the revision it was determined that the poly had dislodged.The surgeon was concerned that the locking mechanism failed and requested the poly analyzed.Four x-rays with poor quality were provided.The screws could be seen only on two of the four x-rays.It seems that the implant was correctly implanted.In the available surgical reports no inconspicuousness regarding screw implantation could be found.The device analysis could not be performed as the device was not returned for investigation.Based on the given information and the results of the investigation, the complaint could not be confirmed as the alleged failure could not be identified or reproduced.The involved anatomical shoulder inverse/reverse screws were not affected at all.The dislodgment of the pe inlay is related to (b)(4) only.This is a split case with (b)(4).Zimmer (b)(4) considers this case as closed.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INVERSE/REVERSE SCREW SYSTEM, 4.5-30
Type of Device
ZIMMER TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER GMBH
sulzerallee 8
winterthur, 8404
SZ  8404
Manufacturer Contact
kevin escapule
p.o. box 708
warsaw, IN 46581-0708
5742676131
MDR Report Key5024675
MDR Text Key23824225
Report Number9613350-2015-01010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 08/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/24/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2018
Device Catalogue Number01.04223.030
Device Lot Number2711705
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/07/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/17/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-