Reported device not marketed in the u.S., however, similar devices or devices that share components, raw materials, process methods or any other technological characteristics with a medical device registered within the u.S.Are rare.Manufacturing site evaluation: evaluation on-going.
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: samples received: 3 unopened units.Analysis and results: there are no previous complaints of this code batch.(b)(4) units of this product were manufactured and distributed, there are no units in stock.Tested the wound closure strength of the samples received and have not found any significant differences.The result is correct.This test method is a standard test method for determining the comparative wound closure strength of tissue adhesives and covers a means for comparison of wound closure strength of tissue adhesives used to help secure the apposition of soft tissue.Tested the adhesive strength of the samples received and the result fulfills the oem product specification.The viscosity has been tested and the result is slightly higher, but it is into the current range for this product.Nevertheless, the result is based in only one value as the sample quantity was very low.The polymerization time, histoacryl of the samples received polymerized as expected, no differences have been found with the standard values.Reviewed the batch manufacturing record, this product had a normal process and the results during the process fulfil product specifications.Final conclusion: complaint is not justified.Actions on product: not applicable.Corrective/preventive actions: not applicable.
|