Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.Device not reportedly explanted.(b)(6).Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Dhr review ¿ manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 28.May 2009 expiry date: 01.May 2019.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from synthes eu reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: after the implantation of a peek cage in lwk 4/5, there was no tantum marker in the ap and lateral x-ray, so neither device could be identified.The implant insertion holder would not hold during implantation, thus the peek cage had to be inserted free-hand using the cage positioning aid.The exact location of the implants could not be confirmed.There was reportedly 20 minutes surgical delay.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
|