• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OSTIAL CORPORATION FLASH MINI OSTIAL SYSTEM; PTCA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OSTIAL CORPORATION FLASH MINI OSTIAL SYSTEM; PTCA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number OCB4008BA
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 07/29/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the details of the case provided by the local sales representative and the hospital staff, there is no indication that the flash mini balloon did not perform as intended.The most likely potential causes identified for the vessel damage are oversizing of the balloon relative to the reference vessel diameter or incorrect positioning of the balloon too far distally within the stent; however, neither of the potential root causes can be reasonably confirmed based on the available information.While the hospital was unable to confirm the reference vessel diameter, it was noted that the diameter of the stent being dilated was 3.5mm and the diameter of the occlusion balloon used following the perforation was 2.75mm.As both are less than the 4.0mm diameter of the flash mini device being used in the procedure it is likely that the flash mini device was oversized relative to the vessel diameter.As the device from the case was discarded by the hospital and no cines from the case were available for analysis, no definitive conclusions could be drawn regarding whether or not the device was properly positioned.In addition to the case details, ostial corporation reviewed the manufacturing documentation associated with the most recently sold lots of 4.0x8mm flash mini devices.No issues were noted that would have contributed to the reported incident.The instructions for use for the product were also reviewed and it was verified that perforation is listed as a potential complication associated with the procedure.User facility discarded device.
 
Event Description
A 3.5 x 15mm medtronic resolute integrity stent was deployed at the ostium of the right coronary artery (rca).Following use of a 4.0x8mm flash mini ostial system within the stent, a perforation was noted on the distal end of the stent.A 2.75x20mm medtronic euphora balloon was used to occlude the perforated area.The patient was transferred for immediate emergent bypass.Follow up with the hospital staff indicated that the patient had recovered from the surgery and no further complications were noted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLASH MINI OSTIAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
PTCA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
OSTIAL CORPORATION
1221 innsbruck drive
sunnyvale CA 94089 1317
Manufacturer (Section G)
OSTIAL CORPORATION
1221 innsbruck drive
sunnyvale CA 94089 1317
Manufacturer Contact
jake wolenberg
1221 innsbruck drive
sunnyvale, CA 94089-1317
4085411006
MDR Report Key5040417
MDR Text Key24516985
Report Number3008700817-2015-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K131450
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,health profession
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Report Date 08/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/28/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberOCB4008BA
Device Catalogue NumberOCB4008BA
Device Lot NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-