Based on the details of the case provided by the local sales representative and the hospital staff, there is no indication that the flash mini balloon did not perform as intended.The most likely potential causes identified for the vessel damage are oversizing of the balloon relative to the reference vessel diameter or incorrect positioning of the balloon too far distally within the stent; however, neither of the potential root causes can be reasonably confirmed based on the available information.While the hospital was unable to confirm the reference vessel diameter, it was noted that the diameter of the stent being dilated was 3.5mm and the diameter of the occlusion balloon used following the perforation was 2.75mm.As both are less than the 4.0mm diameter of the flash mini device being used in the procedure it is likely that the flash mini device was oversized relative to the vessel diameter.As the device from the case was discarded by the hospital and no cines from the case were available for analysis, no definitive conclusions could be drawn regarding whether or not the device was properly positioned.In addition to the case details, ostial corporation reviewed the manufacturing documentation associated with the most recently sold lots of 4.0x8mm flash mini devices.No issues were noted that would have contributed to the reported incident.The instructions for use for the product were also reviewed and it was verified that perforation is listed as a potential complication associated with the procedure.User facility discarded device.
|