The caller alleged a variance between the inratio inr result and the laboratory inr result.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient tested on the inratio and the inr result was 1.7.Multiple drops of blood was added to the testing strip.This is considered to be an improper technique when testing on the inratio device.The patient's therapeutic range was 2.0 - 3.0, therefore the patient's spouse recommended to increase the coumadin for the day to 3mg.The patient's normal coumadin dose was 1-2 mg daily.Two (2) days later on (b)(6) 2015, the patient was scheduled to be hospitalized and have a planned kidney stone procedure.Upon admission to the hospital, the laboratory inr was 8.0 and the patient was diagnosed as having severe sepsis and anemia.During the hospital stay, the patient was taken off coumadin, the kidney stones were removed and the patient was given 3 pints of blood.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient was discharged from the hospital in stable condition.His hematocrit was 27.6 and the inr was 1.18.As of (b)(6) 2015, the patient was bridging onto coumadin with lovenox.The caller indicated that over the past two (2) years that the patient had been dealing with chronic kidney stones and urinary tract infections which often resulted in sepsis.There was no additional information provided.
|
Investigation/conclusion: as of 10/14/2015, the product was not returned for evaluation.A review in-house testing was performed.The in-house strip testing on strip lot 364994a met criteria and the product performed as expected.The manufacturing records for the lot were reviewed and the lot met release specifications.There is no indication of a product deficiency and corrective actions are required.Capa investigation (capa-14-005) has determined that certain relevant conditions (e.G.Low hematocrit, sepsis) can contribute to discrepant inr results.The patient was reported to have severe sepsis and anemia.This capa has identified these conditions as a conditions that may contribute to a discrepant inr result.Since the monitor was not returned, the impedance curve associated with the discrepant result could not be analyzed for characteristics of a weak-slope change.An impedance curve with a weak-slope change has also been identified in capa-14-005 to contribute to a potential discrepant result.Although an improper technique was identified in the complaint, a root cause could not be determined from the information provided by the customer.Further investigation was performed under capa-14-005.
|