It was reported that during a procedure using an ambient super multivac 50 wand, the electrode detached from the wand's tip while inside of the surgical site.The site was x-rayed, however the detached tip could not be located.The procedure was ultimately completed using a back up ambient super multivac 50 wand.There were no significant delays or patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
The device used for treatment was returned for visual and functional evaluation.The customer¿s complaint has been visually verified; however, the physical evidence would suggest the device had reached its end of useful life as can be seen by the rounded edges present on the remaining electrodes.The root cause for this event is expected wear and tear of the device as the failure is consistent with normal wear of the electrodes and is dependent on factors that can accelerate the wear of electrodes, such as using set points higher than the default settings or using the wand for an extended period of time.The ifu contains instructions on obtaining the maximum effect such as, ¿ambient super multivac 50 devices are not designed for prolonged ablation.Electrodes wear under use and the rate of wear is dependent on variables that cannot be replicated in all cases.Factors of electrode wear include, but are not limited to, rate of ablation, power settings, prolonged use against dense or bony surfaces, suction rate, and fluid management.¿ a device history review confirmed that no abnormalities were reported with this product during manufacture.
|