• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST Back to Search Results
Model Number 200432
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problems Misdiagnosis (2159); Confusion/ Disorientation (2553)
Event Date 07/28/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation conclusion: investigation pending.
 
Event Description
Patient self tester called alleging discrepant inratio values.Patient's therapeutic range 2-3.(b)(6) 2015: inratio = 2.2.(b)(6) 2015: patient self tester went to (b)(6) emergency room (er) due to cough, runny nose, and the loss of appetite lasting a week.Patient was treated with a rocephin injection, prescribed an oral antibiotic and was discharged on (b)(6) 2015.(b)(6) 2015: the patient was taken to (b)(6) emergency room by her husband because she felt dazed and confused.Lab inr was 12.0.Patient was treated with vitamin k via an intravenous drip.The hospital doctors informed her she might have had an allergic reaction to the antibiotics that caused her symptoms.Patient underwent a magnetic resonance imaging, to rule out a stroke, and her arteries were checked which showed "nothing" according to the patient.No diagnoses provided by the patient.(b)(6) 2015: patient signed herself out of the hospital prior to speaking with the doctor that day.All medications were stopped with the exception of her coumadin and a cholesterol medication.No other inr readings were provided by the patient that were performed at the hospital.Patient retested on the inratio at home and obtained a 1.3.(b)(6) 2015: inratio = 2.3.No additional information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation conclusion: the meter that was originally listed as a concomitant device was returned for investigation.The strips were not returned.The customer's complaint was not confirmed during in-house testing.Retain strips tested on the returned meter met accuracy criteria.In addition, a review of the entire in-house testing history for the lot was performed.In-house strip testing on the reported strip lot meets release criteria.The product performed as expected.Manufacturing batch record review revealed no non-conformances.The lot meets release specifications.The returned meter passed functional and thermistor testing requirements during in-house investigation.The returned meter performed as expected.Root cause could not be determined from the information provided by the customer.Based on the information available, there is no indication of a product deficiency.No corrective action is required at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
New information: the meter associated with the complaint was returned for investigation.The customer's complaint was not confirmed during in-house testing.Retain strips tested on the returned meter meet accuracy criteria.The meter met functional and thermistor testing requirements.The system performed as expected.A review of the entire in-house testing history for the lot was performed.In-house strip testing on the reported strip lot meets release criteria.Manufacturing batch record review revealed no non-conformances.The lot met release specifications.The customer's reported results were successfully located in the returned meter's memory; however, the customer's inr result of 1.3 was not located on the reported date of occurrence but appeared on (b)(6) 2015.Impedance curve analysis could not be performed on the customer's reported inratio inr results because only the last 4 impedance curves can be retrieved from the meter memory.The customer's results were not found within the last 4 impedance curves.Root cause could not be determined from the information provided by the customer.Capa-(b)(4) was initiated to investigate the cause of highly discrepant results.Further investigation into this issue is being performed under capa-(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
9975 summers ridge road
san diego CA 92121
Manufacturer Contact
ya-ling king
9975 summers ridge road
san diego, CA 92121
8588052084
MDR Report Key5058390
MDR Text Key25106868
Report Number2027969-2015-00651
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072727
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/04/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number200432
Device Lot Number367839A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/07/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Removal/Correction NumberZ0880, 0881, 0882-2015
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-