During the planned generator replacement surgery, the surgeon observed that the lead appeared to be frayed and "shredded." it was reported that there was no indication of high lead impedance.As a result, the lead was also replaced.It was unknown if the leads were intact and it was just an issue with the insulation.The explanted lead has been received for analysis by the manufacturer.However, analysis has not been completed to date.The return product form indicated the reason for lead replacement as "lead discontinuity.".
|
Analysis was completed on the explanted generator and lead.Note that a large portion of the lead assembly including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.During visual analysis, there were two areas of the quadfilar coils that appeared to be broken.Scanning electron microscopy (sem) identified the areas as having evidence of being worn to the point of fracture with flat spots on the coil surfaces and no pitting.An abraded opening was observed on the outer silicone tubing with body fluids inside the tubing.It is unknown if the breaks occurred while stimulation was present due to the absence of metal pitting on the broken coil wire surfaces.The abraded opening was found on the outer and inner silicone tubing, which most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the inner silicone tubing.The lead assembly has dried remnants of what appear to have once been body fluids inside the outer and inner silicone tubes, in some areas.No other obvious anomalies were noted.There was no additional anomalies observed except for damage made during the explant process.Analysis of the generator confirmed no anomalies with the device.Review of device manufacturing records of the generator and lead confirmed that all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.
|