Catalog Number 5545-A-401 |
Device Problems
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911); Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem (2975)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 08/11/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a zimmer left total knee revision, surgeon went to implant the tibial augment and noticed a size discrepancy immediately - surgeon noticed overhang which confirmed the size discrepancy.Device was labeled as a sz 4 on the device, packaging, labeling etc.But augment was bigger closer to a size 6.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding an oversized size 4 triathlon augment was reported.The event was confirmed.Device history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events reported for the reported manufacturing lot.Visual inspection: the device was returned and appears to be in new condition.Visually the device is unremarkable.Dimensional inspection : the device was run on cmm ma-10980.As part of the inspection process, a cmm program is ran in order to measure the device features.The program will start once it is able to detect features unique to the size of the device, which the program uses as an origin point.The cmm was unable to run under the measurement of the size 4 program, 5545-a-401-1-buy_rev01, as it was unable to determine the origin features.The program for the device of the next size, part 5545-a-501 was then performed, in which the cmm passed the part as a size 5; therefore, confirming the event that the device is not a size 4 as marked, but a larger size.Review of the device markings indicated that device is a size 4; however, dimensional inspection was performed and determined that the device was a size 5.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a zimmer left total knee revision, surgeon went to implant the tibial augment and noticed a size discrepancy immediately - surgeon noticed overhang which confirmed the size discrepancy.Device was labeled as a sz 4 on the device, packaging, labeling etc.But augment was bigger closer to a size 6.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|