Investigation findings: call (b)(4) was received indicating that finished good 89-7012, general surgery pack, lot number 39565826, contained a lap sponge contaminated with an insect.The qc complaint specialist reviewed the work order for discrepancies that would have contributed to the reported issue.No discrepancies were identified.Lot mapping identified that finished good 89-7012, lot number 39565826, contained raw material (b)(4), lot number 21nh12.(b)(4) supplied the raw material lot number.The 2013-2015 supplier corrective action request (scar) and supplier notification letter (snl) logs were evaluated for similar complaints.Similar complaints were identified for contamination of a lap sponge.(b)(4) was issued and due 9/1/2015.The qc complaint specialist contacted (b)(4) in reference to the scar on the following dates: (b)(6) 2015.(b)(4) requested additional time to complete the scar response.The deroyal supply chain department was included in communication with the vendor for awareness of the report.Refer to the call (b)(4) email communication.(b)(4) responded to the scar on (b)(4) 2015.Refer to the (b)(4) response.The sample was received and evaluated, but the source of the insect could not be determined.The 21 cfr requires each manufacturer to establish and maintain procedures to prevent contamination of equipment or product by substances that reasonably could be expected to adversely affect product quality.The clean manufacturing area is monitored to minimize bug contamination.Although these processes cannot totally be controlled, there are steps which can be taken to maximize their effects.To assist in preventing the issue from occurring, the lafollette tray division complies with deroyal corp.(b)(4), pest control procedure, by having a pest control company conduct monthly pest control.This reduces the likelihood of pests entering the facility and work areas.The qc supervisor of the manufacturing facility reviewed the pest control documentation.The facility is up to date on pest control and no lapse in service has occurred.Refer to the branch plant 20 pest control documentation attachment.Correction: a credit has been provided.Root cause analysis: the true root cause of the insect contamination has not been identified.Insect contamination has been identified as coming from two potential sources.The first source was identified as being introduced into the manufacturing facility/products via vendor supplied products.A scar was issued to address the potential source of a vendor supplied item.Scar: the lot was manufactured in the summer.The insect might have gone into the finished product warehouse while one of the packages/cartons was not properly sealed.The second source was identified as the manufacturing facility.Possible root causes have been identified as the following: insects and their invasive behavior during times of excessive cold or hot weather conditions; all potential access points have not been identified; dock doors are open during delivery and/or shipment periods; employees entering and exiting the building; and pests can enter in the manufacturing area via employee clothing.Corrective action and/or systemic correction action taken: scar: increase inspection of the final package/carton.Deroyal: due to the investigation and root cause determination, a corrective action has not been taken.Preventive action: scar: implement more insect controls at the finished product warehouse.Deroyal: due to the investigation and root cause determination, a preventive action has not been taken.The investigation is complete at this time.This report will be updated if new information becomes available.
|