Catalog Number SGC01ST |
Device Problems
Device Slipped (1584); Physical Resistance (2578)
|
Patient Problem
Atrial Perforation (2511)
|
Event Date 08/20/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the device could not be performed.The analysis of this complaint was an assessment of the information provided to abbott vascular, the manufacturing records and complaint history.The investigation determined that the reported slippage of the device and physical resistance appear to be related to user technique and patient anatomy.The reported patient effect of atrial perforation is listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use (ifu) as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported atrial perforation appears to be related to procedural conditions.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacture, or labeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
This event is being filed because the steerable guide catheter (sgc)slipped out of position and a shunt was noted, which required additional treatment to prevent permanent impairment to the patient.It was reported that the procedure on (b)(6) 2015 was to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The first clip was deployed without issue, reducing mr to 1-2.During positioning of the second clip delivery system (cds), the stabilizer was moved to bring the cds closer to the deployed clip; however, after this maneuver, the steerable guide catheter (sgc) slipped from the left atrium to the right atrium.Attempts to reposition the sgc back into the left atrium were unsuccessful; therefore, the cds was retracted back into the sgg and the devices were removed together as a single unit.A shunt was then noted at the septum, which could not be treated as there was no appropriately sized treatment device available.The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (icu) and the shunt was treated the following day.There was no reported adverse patient sequela and the patient was discharged from the hospital on (b)(6) 2015.There was no additional information provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|