• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE TI CRADLE END HALF; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE TI CRADLE END HALF; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 497.126
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight not provided by reporter.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in japan as follows: in 2010 a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) system was initially implanted to the rib-l for the treatment of thoracic insufficiency syndrome (tis).A replacement operation was performed on (b)(6), 2014, followed by a lengthening operation on an unknown date.When the patient had a postoperative follow-up, it was found that the patient had dislocation of the cranial rib support.To avoid the patient's tis worsening, an operation was performed on (b)(6), 2015.During the operation, any trace of the brakeage of the rib where the cranial rib support was attached could not be found thus leaving question for how the dislocation occurred.Patient is reportedly very active and moved around freely in her daily life, it was suspected that the rib support may have dislocated while the patient was moving around.The reported cranial rib support was replaced with another cranial rib support (veptr ii) during the vision surgery.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device history record review: manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 23september2011.Part: 497.126, lot: 6741875 (non-sterile) - ti cradle end half.Lot was release to the warehouse on 23september2011.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Subject device has been received; no conclusions could be drawn as the device is entering the complaint system.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product investigation summary: two relevant construct components were returned: neutral 220mm superior cradle (part 497.057 / lot 6714005) and a cradle end half (part 497.126 / lot 6741875).The returned implants were examined; minor surface scratches and anodization wear consistent with implantation and explantation were present on both devices.No additional defects were noted.Additional construct components were returned: titanium rib sleeve (part 497.111 / lot 6905269), distraction lock x2 (part 497.125 / lots 7544298 and 7544305), cradle lock (part 497.128 / lot 6641738), and lumbar extension (part 497.253 / lot 6033396).No specific allegation was made against these components; as such no investigation is necessary.The superior cradle and cradle end half are components of veptr system instrument and implant set, which is utilized in veptr procedures to mechanically stabilize and distract the thorax to correct three-dimensional thoracic deformities.The superior cradle and cradle end half are specifically utilized as the superior point of attachment for the construct.After both components are in place and aligned, they are locked with a cradle lock to ensure the assembly is secure and fully encircles the rib.The relevant drawings for the returned instrument were reviewed.The design, materials, and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of these devices.A device history review was performed for the returned instrument¿s lot numbers and in each instance no material record reports, non-conformance reports, or complaint-related issues were identified with the lots numbers which may have contributed to the complaint condition.No definitive root cause was able to be determined with the provided information.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TI CRADLE END HALF
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5081462
MDR Text Key25965316
Report Number2520274-2015-15905
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK142587
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/02/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number497.126
Device Lot Number6741875
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/07/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/23/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age9 YR
-
-