• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS BROVIAC 4.2 FR CATHETER PEEL-APART INTRODUCER KIT WITH SURECUFF TISSUE INGROWTH; PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS BROVIAC 4.2 FR CATHETER PEEL-APART INTRODUCER KIT WITH SURECUFF TISSUE INGROWTH; PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0600520
Device Problems Material Rupture (1546); Stretched (1601); Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problem Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 08/26/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.A lot history review (lhr) of huzb1168 showed two other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.Both complaints for this lot number (huzb1168) have been reported from the same us facility.The manufacturer has received the sample and will be evaluated.Results are expected soon.
 
Event Description
Per facility contact, patient was reportedly brought to the peds ed on (b)(6) 2015.While in the ed, the line was flushed but subsequently allegedly ruptured.An internal and external dissection was allegedly noted proximal to the clamping area (where the thin part meets the larger portion).The line was noted to have 2 prior repairs.The line was said to have been purposefully repaired by removing one of the prior splices so that only 2 splices (one new, one old) remained on the line.When patient's mother was told that it looked like the line had been over-stretched, she stated that she saw the patient reportedly pulling on it a lot the day prior ((b)(6) 2015).Mother of patient also stated that she noted a bulge/ballooning effect when she flushed it on (b)(6) 2015.It's likely that the line sustained an internal dissection the day prior and then fully ruptured while the patient was in the ed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a ballooning catheter was confirmed and the cause appears to be use related.The product returned for evaluation was one 4.2fr single-lumen broviac catheter repair segment.Usage residue was seen throughout the sample.The sample terminated 2.8cm distal to the clamping oversleeve.Microscopic examination of the distal end revealed striations typical of a scissor cut.Superficial scoring abrasions were seen in the clamping oversleeve.The markings on the clamping oversleeve were observed to be completed worn off the catheter material.The sample was patent to infusion and aspiration using water from a 12ml syringe with no observed leaks.During hydraulic pressurization, ballooning of the catheter was noted just distal to the clamping oversleeve.Tensile weakness was noted in the ballooning region.Microscopic examination of the ballooning region revealed translucency, indicative of a catheter break of the inner catheter.The characteristics of the catheter damage, as well as the description of the event, are indicative of mishandling of the catheter during use.Care should be taken to avoid pulling the catheter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.During year-end review, the initial complaint appeared to be a reportable occurrence.Once the sample was returned and evaluated it was determined that a reportable event had not occurred per 21 crf803.19.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BROVIAC 4.2 FR CATHETER PEEL-APART INTRODUCER KIT WITH SURECUFF TISSUE INGROWTH
Type of Device
PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
christy chandonia
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225631
MDR Report Key5082578
MDR Text Key26257646
Report Number3006260740-2015-00418
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K830256
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 08/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0600520
Device Lot NumberHUZB1168
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/15/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received12/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-