• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE; LLD-EZ

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE; LLD-EZ Back to Search Results
Model Number 518-062
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Unspecified Infection (1930); Injury (2348); Fibrosis (3167)
Event Date 09/15/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This was a left-sided lead extraction procedure to remove three cardiac leads due to cied system/pocket infection and a class ii indication (bsc fidelis lv lead 4555, implanted 96 months, trending increase in svc impedance).The leads were prepped with llds and a cook bulldog lead extender was also used.A 14f glidelight and medium visisheath were used to extract.The rv lead (bsc 4472 fineline, implanted 96 months) was extracted successfully.During extraction of the lv lead, moderate fibrosis was noted in the innominate/svc area that required the laser sheath.The visisheath was used for support and was not advanced past the laser sheath.The laser was then advanced down to the svc/ra junction where heavy fibrosis was noted.After advancing through this area, the tip of the lv lead dislodged from the cs.At this time, the patient experienced a sudden drop in blood pressure.The ct surgeon was called for and chest compressions were initiated immediately.A sternotomy was performed and an injury to the svc/ra junction was discovered and repaired.The patient survived the intervention.The 3rd lead (bsc 0185 rv lead, implanted 96 months) was extracted manually during the open procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted to report that the suspect device in this case has changed.After further investigation by the sales rep and after discussing this event further with the physician, the suspect device has been changed from a glidelight to an lld.The physician stated that he believes the injury occurred when the laser sheath was advanced over a binding site proximal to the injury and the lead pulled at the next binding site, therefore tearing the svc/ra junction where it was attached.The physician believes he was pulling more than necessary and it was not a direct laser sheath injury.As the lld was the traction platform being used to pull on the lead, it is the suspect device in this case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device 510k number has been corrected to reflect the most current and up to date number, as of the date of the initial report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE
Type of Device
LLD-EZ
Manufacturer (Section D)
SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION
9965 federal drive
colorado springs CO 80921
Manufacturer (Section G)
SPECTRANETICS
Manufacturer Contact
barbara creel
9965 federal drive
colorado springs, CO 80921
7194472258
MDR Report Key5082719
MDR Text Key25998264
Report Number1721279-2015-00145
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K142116
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date07/02/2017
Device Model Number518-062
Device Catalogue Number518-062
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Other Device ID NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/02/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
-
-