• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL BRASIL LTDA. (NOVA LIMA) EPIC SUPRA VALVE W/FLEXFIT; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL BRASIL LTDA. (NOVA LIMA) EPIC SUPRA VALVE W/FLEXFIT; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number ESP100-25
Device Problems Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944); Naturally Worn (2988); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/26/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This epic supra ( esp100-25 [sn: (b)(4)]) implanted on (b)(6) 2013 at (b)(6) hospital was explanted on (b)(6) 2015 by the original implanting surgeon.Valve integrity of the explanted device appeared consistent and there were no leaflet tears or immediate signs of wear or svd visually noted.The leaflets were covered with an unidentified organic material which had attached to the each leaflet cusp on both superior and inferior sides of the valve.Part of the polyester sewing cuff was torn during the explantation of the valve and exposed the silicone ring.A photograph and video were taken of the explanted valve.Anesthesiologist advised that the eao of the valve prior to explant was 0.5cm2/m2.The patient had elected to have a mechanical valve as a replacement device and the onyx aortic valve was selected.A 25mm onyx valve was implanted and the aorta closed.However, the onyx valve was removed prior to the patient coming off by-pass as it appeared to be an unsuitable fit for the patient's anatomy.The surgeon then elected to implant a 23 aehpj (sn: (b)(4)).The aorta was then closed and came off by-pass.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The results of this investigation indicated there was fibrous thickening of cusp 1.There was organizing thrombus with focal calcification on the outflow surface of cusps 1 and 3.There was a thin layer of fibrin on cusps 1 and 2.Multiple perforations were observed in cusp 2.There was fibrous pannus ingrowth on the inflow surface of cusp 3.Special stains were negative for organisms, and no acute inflammation was present.There was no evidence found to suggest the cause of the fibrin, thrombus, calcification, pannus, and perforations were due to an intrinsic defect in the valve, as supported by review of the valve's device history record and the analysis performed.The cause of the reported event remains unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EPIC SUPRA VALVE W/FLEXFIT
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL BRASIL LTDA. (NOVA LIMA)
caixa postal 106
belo horizonte 34000 -000
BR  34000-000
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL BRASIL LTDA. (NOVA LIMA)
caixa postal 106
belo horizonte 34000 -000
BR   34000-000
Manufacturer Contact
denise johnson
5050 nathan lane north
plymouth, MN 55442
6517564470
MDR Report Key5086964
MDR Text Key26153704
Report Number3001743903-2015-00035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
P040021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Report Date 08/26/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/18/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date12/11/2014
Device Model NumberESP100-25
Device Catalogue NumberESP100-25
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/17/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient Weight93
-
-