• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC TRUFILL DCS ORBIT DETACHABLE COILS COMPLEX; CNV DCS ORBIT (HCG)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC TRUFILL DCS ORBIT DETACHABLE COILS COMPLEX; CNV DCS ORBIT (HCG) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 638MF0410
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Stretched (1601); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/07/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi# (b)(4).Initial reporter: (b)(6).The device will be returned for analysis, but it has not been received for analysis.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event Description
During the stent assist coil embolization procedure the orbit mini comp fill 4x10 tdl coil (638mf0410/16080557) could not be advanced to aneurysm.The surgeon decided to remove the coil but it was stretched.The surgeon had to remove the mc and coil.And then he reshaped the mc and changed the new coil to complete.There was no report on patient injury.The target site was the ophthalmic aneurysm with 4.8*5.9mm.The microcatheter used with the coil was a prowler 14, and a constant and dedicated saline source was used at all times.Other than the reported event, no other damages were noticed on the device (kink, bend, fracture, separate, etc.), and the coil remained attached to the delivery system.No further information was available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient is female and (b)(6) years old, had ophthalmic aneurysm with 4.8*5.9mm.During the stent assist coil embolization procedure the orbit mini comp fill 4x10 tdl coil (638mf0410/16080557) could not be advanced to aneurysm.The surgeon decided to remove the coil but it was stretched.The surgeon had to remove the mc and coil.And then he reshaped the mc and changed the new coil to complete.There was no report on patient injury.The microcatheter used with the coil was a prowler 14, and a constant and dedicated saline source was used at all times.Other than the reported event, no other damages were noticed on the device (kink, bend, fracture, separate, etc.), and the coil remained attached to the delivery system.After the microcatheter was reshaped it was utilized to complete the procedure.The shaping mandrel was used to reshape the tip and no damages were noticed after reshaping was completed.The microcatheter is not going to be returned for analysis.No further information was available.A non-sterile orbit mini comp fill 4x10 tdl was received coiled in dispenser inside pouch of original packaging inside of a plastic bag.No damages were noted on the hub.The hypotube was inspected and it was found severely kinked and appears that it was kinked before it was separated.The introducer was received unzipped and it was found damage.The support coil was inspected and it was found without damage.The gripper was found elongation condition and residues of dry blood were found on it.The soldered section of the headpiece was found in the gripper.The rest of the embolic coil was found separated and stretched.The gripper and headpiece were inspected under microscope; elongation condition and residues of dry blood were found on it.The soldered section between headpiece and the coil loops was not fractured so this means that the solder had a good adhesion to the headpiece.The rest of the embolic coil was found stretched.The od from the delivery tube was measured and was found within specification.The functional test could not be performed due to device condition received.The review of lots 16080557 and 16051584 presented no issues that were considered potentially related to the reported complaint.The failure reported by the customer as ¿detachable coil delivery system (dcs)- resistance/friction-during advancement ¿could not be evaluated due to conditions of the device received.The failure reported by the customer as ¿coil- unraveled/stretched¿ was confirmed during the microscope analysis.The failure reported by the customer as ¿coil- withdrawal difficulty-into microcatheter¿ could not be evaluated.The condition of the embolic coil was apparently caused by applying excessive force on it but it could not be conclusively determined.However; these defects could not be related to the manufacturing process and procedural factors appear to have contributed to have these damages.Neither the analysis nor the dhr suggest that the failure reported could be related to the manufacturing process.Additionally inspections are in place that prevents this kind of failures from leaving the facility.Therefore no corrective action will be taken at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information indicated that after the microcatheter was reshaped it was utilized to complete the procedure.The shaping mandrel was used to reshape the tip and no damages were noticed after reshaping was completed.The microcatheter is not going to be returned for analysis.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRUFILL DCS ORBIT DETACHABLE COILS COMPLEX
Type of Device
CNV DCS ORBIT (HCG)
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount dr
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
kimberly soter
325 paramount dr
raynham, MA 02767
5089777396
MDR Report Key5089823
MDR Text Key26247536
Report Number1226348-2015-00033
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K053197
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Report Date 09/17/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/19/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/29/2016
Device Catalogue Number638MF0410
Device Lot Number16080557
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/24/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/06/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age60 YR
-
-