• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK 5.5 HEALIX ADVANCE BR 3 SUTURE ANCHOR W/ ORTHOCORD; ANCHOR IMPLANTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK 5.5 HEALIX ADVANCE BR 3 SUTURE ANCHOR W/ ORTHOCORD; ANCHOR IMPLANTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 222298
Device Problem Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device has been received and is currently being investigated.When the evaluation results are available, a follow up medwatch report will be filed.Under investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after arcr surgery the surgeon found by images that the device inserted outside the greater tubercle of humerus had come off although the patient was going to leave the hospital soon.The device in question is now put under the acromion.The surgeon reported that he had inserted the device properly.There is no pain with the patient and he is under observation.Revision has not been planned yet.The following additional information was received from our affiliate via e-mail on (b)(6) 2015.The date of the original procedure is unknown.The revision surgery occurred on (b)(6).The affiliate indicated that they were notified of the event sometime in (b)(6).The affiliate provided product code 222298 for the failed device but the lot number of the device is unknown.The surgeon used an awl to prepare the bone hole.The device had pulled out of the bone hole and it is unknown if another like device was used to complete the procedure.The affiliate was able to provide the alert date as (b)(6) 2015.Affiliate has also indicated that the revision surgery took place on (b)(6) and the device in question will be returned for investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device was received and evaluated.It was noted that only the anchor had been returned.The suture and inserter were not returned.Inspection of anchor distal tip reveals a small crack in the anchor.The proximal end of the anchor has been flattened.This was probably caused by the removal of the anchor or could have happened in transit.The threads on the anchor appear stressed consistent with it being inserted into the bone.It can be confirmed that this anchor pulled out.Typically, anchor pull outs are associated with incomplete insertion into the bone hole, using instruments not indicated to be used with the anchor, poor bone quality and applying excess force on suture during tensioning.Although we cannot discern a root cause, any of the aforementioned factors or a combination of factors could possibly lead to this failure.This complaint can be confirmed.A batch review was not conducted as the batch number is unknown.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after arcr surgery the surgeon found by images that the device inserted outside the greater tubercle of humerus had come off although the patient was going to leave the hospital soon.The device in question is now put under the acromion.The surgeon reported that he had inserted the device properly.There is no pain with the patient and he is under observation.Revision has not been planned yet.The following additional information was received from our affiliate via e-mail on 9/8/2015.The date of the original procedure is unknown.The revision surgery occurred on (b)(6).The affiliate indicated that they were notified of the event sometime in (b)(4).The affiliate provided product code 222298 for the failed device but the lot number of the device is unknown.The surgeon used an awl to prepare the bone hole.The device had pulled out of the bone hole and it is unknown if another like device was used to complete the procedure.The affiliate was able to provide the alert date as august 28, 2015.Affiliate has also indicated that the revision surgery took place on (b)(6) and the device in question will be returned for investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
5.5 HEALIX ADVANCE BR 3 SUTURE ANCHOR W/ ORTHOCORD
Type of Device
ANCHOR IMPLANTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
dennis mcgovern
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8008283716
MDR Report Key5102197
MDR Text Key26715687
Report Number1221934-2015-00987
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K120078
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 08/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/24/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number222298
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/18/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date08/28/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer08/28/2015
Date Manufacturer Received08/28/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-