The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will be evaluated.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leaking catheter was inconclusive because the alleged damage could not be discerned through inspection of the provided photograph.The product returned for evaluation was one photograph depicting a 4fr s/l powerpicc catheter.The catheter depicted in the photograph had an attached injection cap and was being held by a gloved hand.A sharp bend (kink) was visible in the catheter tubing near what appeared to be the 8cm depth marking.No other details were discernible in the photograph.While a kink was visible in the provided photograph in the vicinity of the alleged leak, the photograph was insufficient to verify the presence of catheter damage sufficient to result in a leak.Consequently this complaint is inconclusive at this time.
|