• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Nerve Damage (1979); Pain (1994); Thrombosis (2100); Tissue Damage (2104); Impaired Healing (2378); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment not diagnosis lowey, g , kulkarni, s (2000).Posterior percutaneous spine instrumentation.Eur spine j 9 (suppl 1) :s126¿s130.This report is for an unknown uss connector, unknown quantity / unknown lot number.(b)(4) 2 patients underwent hardware removal due to prominent hardware, 5 patients underwent hardware revision for either screw replacement or mild discomfort of their hardware; 3 patients had obvious intradiscal nonunions, 1 patient had iliac vein injury , 8 patients experienced transitional syndrome above and below the fusion, 4% of patients had unsuccessful fusion.1 patient had screws removed due to transient foot drop, 2 patients had screws removed due to persistent foot drop.7 patients had malposition of screws and underwent revision.The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number was provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article: lowey, g , kulkarni, s (2000).Posterior percutaneous spine instrumentation.Eur spine j 9 (suppl 1) :s126-s130.Eighty consecutive cases of suprafascial pedicle screw stabilization were reviewed.There were 39 men and 41 women studied with an average age of 45 years.The average follow up was 12 months.Posterior stabilization involved the application of titanium shanz screws into the pedicles and titanium uss rod and connectors are attached.A variety of materials were employed for the anterior composite conduit graft.During routine outpatient hardware removal, all intradiscal fusions were stressed via the shanz screws under fluoroscopy.Clinical and radiographic examinations were reviewed.This is report 3 of 3 for (b)(4).This report is for an unknown uss connector and refers to the following complications: 5 patients underwent hardware revision for either screw replacement or mild; discomfort of their hardware; 7 patients had malposition of screws and underwent revision; 2 patients underwent hardware removal due to painful and prominent hardware; 3 patients had obvious intradiscal nonunions; 3 patients had arterial thrombosis; 1 patient had iliac vein injury; 8 patients experienced transitional syndrome above and below the fusion; 2 patients had deep wound infections; 4% of patients had unsuccessful fusion; 5 patients had isolated radicular symptoms; 1 patient had screws removed due to transient foot drop; 2 patients had screws removed due to persistent foot drop.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5113398
MDR Text Key27176974
Report Number2520274-2015-16272
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,litera
Reporter Occupation Pharmacist
Report Date 09/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/30/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-