• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RESPIRONICS, INC. BIPAP PRO; VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINOUS (RESPIRATOR)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RESPIRONICS, INC. BIPAP PRO; VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINOUS (RESPIRATOR) Back to Search Results
Model Number 650P
Device Problems Contamination (1120); Maintenance Does Not Comply To Manufacturers Recommendations (2974)
Patient Problems Low Oxygen Saturation (2477); Respiratory Acidosis (2482)
Event Date 09/12/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was alleged by an end user that he breathed in "smoke" while using a bi-level positive airway pressure (bipap) device.The end user reported being admitted to a hospital and treated with "breathing medications" and supplemental oxygen as a result of elevated carbon dioxide (paco2) and decreased oxygen (pao2) levels.The user was discharged after three days without further incident.The manufacturer received the device for evaluation.There was no evidence of thermal damage to any component.There was physical damage to the top enclosure, indicating a drop of the device.There was also evidence of dirt/dust contamination to the internal surfaces.The impeller assembly showed evidence of having cracked, likely due to the impeller becoming unbalanced from the build-up of contaminants.The failure of the blower assembly is a result of improper care of the device by the user and is not a result of a failure of the device during normal usage.The user reported that he had not received any replacement accessories such as filters "in about ten years".The user manual for this device instructs "under normal usage, you should clean the gray foam filter at least once every two weeks and replace it with a new one every six months.The white ultra-fine filter is disposable and should be replaced after 30 nights of use or sooner if it appears dirty.Do not clean the ultra-fine filter.Caution: dirty inlet filters may cause high operating temperatures that may affect device performance.Regularly examine the inlet filters as needed for integrity and cleanliness." the user is also cautioned "if you notice any unexplained changes in the performance of this device, if it is making unusual or harsh sounds, if it has been dropped or mishandled, if water is spilled into the enclosure, or if the enclosure is broken, disconnect the power cord and discontinue use.Contact your home care provider." the respironics bipap pro bi-flex system delivers positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in spontaneously breathing patients weighing over (b)(6).It is for use in the home or hospital/institutional environment.Based on the information available, the manufacturer concludes the failure of the device was a result of user abuse/misuse, and that no further action is necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPAP PRO
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINOUS (RESPIRATOR)
Manufacturer (Section D)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA 15668
Manufacturer (Section G)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA 15668
Manufacturer Contact
wilfredo alvarez
312 alvin drive
new kensington, PA 15068
7243349303
MDR Report Key5124144
MDR Text Key27359834
Report Number2518422-2015-03046
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BZD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K050759
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/02/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number650P
Device Catalogue Number650P
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/24/2015
Date Manufacturer Received09/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/12/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age32 YR
-
-