• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number P-50 PL
Device Problem Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/09/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: no data regarding product identity including serial number or lot number was received therefore the device history record could not be reviewed.No sample was returned and the device remains implanted.Root cause cannot be determined.No further information is expected.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Following a glaucoma filtration implant surgery a surgeon reported the device gradually began to push outward against the scleral flap ultimately going through and exposing the external plate.No medical intervention was performed.The device remains implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: the product was returned for analysis.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.Results from the product history record review indicated the product met release criteria.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
In a follow up a surgeon reported no change in intraocular pressure (iop) pre and post shunt implantation.The device was explanted due to risk of infection.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: customer reported that after a glaucoma shunt implant surgery the shunt gradually began to push outward against the scleral flap.No data regarding product identity was received i.E.No lot or serial number were indicated for the event; therefore, the device history record (dhr) could not be reviewed.Product was returned for investigation and was found to be proper during visual inspection.Furthermore, the spur hight was measured and found to meet specification.Therefore, there is no indication for a manufacturing related factors that could cause such an event.The root cause could not be conclusively determined and does not seem to be device related.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
eddie darton, md, jd
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8175686660
MDR Report Key5128735
MDR Text Key27861357
Report Number3003701944-2015-00650
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/10/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/05/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberP-50 PL
Device Catalogue Number60053
Device Lot NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/09/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/18/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age87 YR
-
-