(b)(4).Other device used: catalog #00585002012, segmental articular surface, lot #62720659 in returned photographs, the femoral component has visibly dislocated from the articular surface and come through the patient's incision.Surgical notes were not provided.It was reported that the patient had a collapse of the lateral condyle after the unknown total knee components were implanted, which threw the knee into severe valgus, but there was no implant failure.Due to the extensive loss of subchondral bone and the patient's ligamentous instability, the surgeon decided to implant the segmental system.Following the dislocation, it was reported that the original components remained implanted and an irrigation/debridement and reduction were performed after the dislocation and prior to closure of the knee.It was reported that the patient was being seen again for a second wash-out and an articular surface exchange on (b)(6) 2015, but this cannot be confirmed.Five x-rays were returned for review.One x-ray is for the unknown total knee and is likely the components implanted prior to the segmental system, described above; the components are severely malaligned.One x-ray was dated for (b)(6) 2015 and appears to be following the reduction of the segmental system.There is no indication that hyperextension occurred or the hinge post loosened and backed out.The package insert states that dislocation is an adverse effect.This is therefore a known inherent risk of the procedure.A definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.
|