• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, IMMUNOGLOBULINS (D, E)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, IMMUNOGLOBULINS (D, E) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 11930419122
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/01/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The customer received questionable immunoglobulin e (ige) results for one patient from an unknown roche analyzer.The initial result was flagged as greater than the test range and the sample was reanalyzed with a 1:20 dilution.The result that was released was 44,000 iu/ml.Two weeks later on an unspecified date, the patient had ige tested at another hospital using the beckman coulter image and the result was 125 iu/ml.The patient's doctor asked why the initial result did not correlated with what the other hospital released.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient was retested and the result was 2500 iu/ml flagged as greater than test range.When tested with a 1:20 dilution, the result was 50,000 flagged as greater than test range.On (b)(6) 2015, the pathologist decided to check serum protein electrophoresis and the gamma levels were normal.She expected them to be elevated due to high ige levels.The pathologist believed the results were not correct.On (b)(6) 2015, a sample from the patient was tested at another site using a cobas e601 analyzer and the result was 2500 iu/ml flagged as greater than the test range.When diluted 1:20, the result was 49448 iu/ml.No adverse event adverse event was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The analyzer involved was a cobas e601.Information was provided concerning the results: "1st run within institution around 40000 iu/ml (cobas 6000) 1st extraction 2nd run different institution roughly 140 iu/ml (beckman coulter immage) 2nd extraction 3rd run within institution around 40000 iu/ml (cobas 6000) 3rd extraction 4th run different institution with roche cobas 6000 same sample as with 3rd extraction".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A sample from the patient was submitted for investigation and the customer's results could be reproduced.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Sample from the patient was submitted for investigation and the customer's results were confirmed on a cobas e601 and a siemens centaur analyzer.Based on these results, it was believed the result from the beckman coulter was likely incorrect.A general reagent issue with the roche ige assay could be excluded.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMMUNOGLOBULIN E
Type of Device
RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, IMMUNOGLOBULINS (D, E)
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key5134659
MDR Text Key27823110
Report Number1823260-2015-04291
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JHR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeRP
PMA/PMN Number
K984326
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/08/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/30/2016
Device Catalogue Number11930419122
Device Lot Number181429
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Laboratory
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age049 YR
-
-