Catalog Number 509-02-62G |
Device Problems
Device Expiration Issue (1216); Shelf Life Exceeded (1567); Expiration Date Error (2528); Environmental Compatibility Problem (2929)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 09/12/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the customer to the sales rep that locally, a member of staff has been checking expiry dates on products and marking them with a post it note when they are nearing the end of their shelf life.However, on this occasion, this item was marked to expire 11-2015 by staff when it actually expired 01-2015.The actual expiry date does not appear to have been confirmed prior to surgery and the expired product was implanted.This was then discovered when stickers were added to the sticker sheet.The device was immediately explanted and replaced.After implantation but prior to the end of the procedure.The patient was male, age not disclosed.The patient has not experienced any known adverse consequences.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding an expired tritanium shell that was implanted.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: the returned product and manufacturing records were reviewed and both displayed the appropriate expiration date.-medical records received and evaluation: no medical records or x-rays were made available for evaluation.-device history review: review of the device history records indicates that all devices were manufactured within specification and accepted into final stock.-complaint history review: there have been no other events for this lot or sterile lot.Conclusions: the investigation concluded that implantation of the expired product was caused by user error.The customer reported that a member of staff had been checking expiration dates on products and marking the products with post it notes when they are nearing the end of their shelf life.This practice of using bright colored manually created expiration date identification stickers potentially contributed to the misreading of the handwritten date format.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the customer to the sales rep that locally, a member of staff has been checking expiry dates on products and marking them with a post it note when they are nearing the end of their shelf life.However, on this occasion, this item was marked to expire 11-2015 by staff when it actually expired 01-2015.The actual expiry date does not appear to have been confirmed prior to surgery and the expired product was implanted.This was then discovered when stickers were added to the sticker sheet.The device was immediately explanted and replaced.After implantation but prior to the end of the procedure.The patient was male, age not disclosed.The patient has not experienced any known adverse consequences.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|