• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ASCENSION ORTHOPEDICS PIP SZ. 30 PROXIMAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ASCENSION ORTHOPEDICS PIP SZ. 30 PROXIMAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PIP-200-30P-WW
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/18/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported the device broke and revision surgery was required.The surgeon performed a routine joint replacement with the device on (b)(6) 2015.All went well.The surgeon followed surgical technique.The patient presented after surgery with a complication.X-rays showed that the head of the proximal component had broken.The surgeon revised the implant on friday (b)(6) 2015.He removed the proximal component and implanted a new one, along with some impaction grafting.The surgeon is happy with the overall outcome, however not with broken implant.It was reported no patient injury is alleged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complementary information received on (b)(6) 2015: the surgeon has confirmed that as yet there has been no report of infection-like symptoms from the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Integra has completed their internal investigation on nov/30/2015.The investigation included: methods: evaluation of actual device.Review of device history records.Review of complaints history.Results: evaluation of returned device; a visual examination of the implant was performed assisted by a stereomicroscope and oblique lighting.The 30p component fracture was found to be consistent with fractures known to result from impacting an unsupported head, where the stem of the component or trial cannot be fully inserted into the medullary canal due to an improperly prepared oblique osteotomy.Dhr review; one nonconformance was reported in (b)(4) related to coating thickness over specifications reported by the supplier.Integra (b)(4) reviewed the nonconformance and dispositioned it for use as is.No additional nonconformance was reported that could be related to the complaint.Complaints history; a review of complaints for pip implant fractures (both intra-op and post-op) during the last 5 years showed (b)(4) complaints.During this period of time there have been approximately (b)(4) units sold.The resulting rate of complaints is (b)(4) which does not represent an adverse trend.Conclusion: the cause of the failure has been identified as resulting from impacting the unsupported head when the stem of the implant has not been fully inserted into the medullary canal due to an improperly prepared oblique osteotomy.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product identification information provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIP SZ. 30 PROXIMAL
Type of Device
PIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
ASCENSION ORTHOPEDICS
8700 cameron road #100
8700 cameron road #100
austin TX 78754
Manufacturer (Section G)
ASCENSION ORTHOPEDICS
8700 cameron road #100
austin TX 78754
Manufacturer Contact
maria leonard
311 enterprise drive
plainsboro, NJ 08536
6099362393
MDR Report Key5147086
MDR Text Key28142031
Report Number3004608878-2015-00269
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NEG
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
H010005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/14/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberPIP-200-30P-WW
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/02/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-