Submit date: (b)(6) 2016.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no abnormal process conditions were present during the manufacturing of the product that could have led to the reported condition.The dhr review showed that all acceptance criteria inspections per established sampling levels were within acceptable limits during the production process.There were no samples submitted with this complaint therefore the reported condition could not be confirmed.The complaint shall be reopened if a sample is received.The kit code (b)(4) includes the lap sponge part number (b)(4).These lap sponges are not manufactured by the covidien plant and during the receiving inspection process, there were no issues detected.Additionally, a certificate of analysis is provided by the vendor to ensure that the kit components meet the specification required.During the kit assembly process according to the procedure the visual aid notes that the lap sponge process is a (b)(4) operation.There is no additional inspection on the line to detect the condition reported.The most likely root cause is that the material was not received in accordance to the specification.As an immediate containment, the personnel involved in the process were notified of the issue to heighten awareness about this reported condition.The inspection level at the manufacturing line was increased from normal to elevated.A quality alert was posted in at the incoming inspection area, the manufacturing line and the qa laboratory.As a corrective action, the raw material will be weighed at the production line to confirm that the correct quantity is included in the kits.If additional information is received warranting further analysis, the investigation will be resumed.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending purposes.
|