• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BETTLACH 6.0MM HAND REAMER 450MM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BETTLACH 6.0MM HAND REAMER 450MM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 351.920
Device Problem Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 09/24/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported the physician manually started the medullary cavity, with 6mm reamer.When he removed the reamer, he saw that part of the reamer was in the medullary canal.There was no delay to the surgery time.A part of the reamer was left in the patient's bone.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 12november2013.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.A manufacturing evaluation was completed: the product was returned in a packaging different from the original packaging.The laser etching was good readable.Traces of excessive bending are visible in the region of the broken area of the instrument.A device history record review was performed for the affected lot, no abnormalities or deviations were detected, which could lead to the complaint failure.The instrument was manufactured in november 2013 and the instrument was in use for roundabout two years.The instrument shows traces of excessive bending in the region of the broken reamer.Probably the instrument was applied with strong force and it bent and the breakage was caused.Based on this the complaint is rated as confirmed but not as valid from the point of view of the manufacturing site.No manufacturing related issue was identified and/or confirmed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
6.0MM HAND REAMER 450MM
Type of Device
REAMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach PA CH254 4
SZ  CH2544
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach CH254 4
SZ   CH2544
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5150642
MDR Text Key28305979
Report Number2520274-2015-16658
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PEXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/14/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number351.920
Device Lot Number8571075
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/27/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/12/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age18 YR
-
-