Catalog Number SE-06-080-120-6F |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Positioning Failure (1158); Physical Resistance (2578)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 09/18/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion with mild tortuosity and mild calcification in the proximal femoral artery.Pre-dilatation was performed with a 6 x 60 mm armada balloon to 16 atmospheres for 6 seconds.A 6 x 120 mm supera stent was implanted successfully.Then, an attempt was made to overlap with a 6 x 80 mm supera stent; however, there was moderate resistance during advancing with the anatomy and at the time of the stent release, the catheter tip separated preventing further stent deployment.The stent had partially deployed and the system was locked.Under fluoroscopy, the device was withdrawn from the anatomy and replaced with another device.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Type of reportable event changed to serious injury.Evaluation summary: the device was returned and the reported deployment difficulty and resistance could not be confirmed as the stent had already been deployed.The tip detachment was confirmed.A conclusive cause for the deployment issue could not be determined.The resistance advancing, difficulty removing and tip detachment appears to be due to operational context.The cause for the reported dissection and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined; however, dissection is a known potential patient effect as listed in the supera instructions for use.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication the issue was caused by, or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received: there was resistance during removal of the supera from the patient's anatomy.Also, a dissection occurred at the end of the procedure which was treated with a drug eluting stent.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|