|
Catalog Number UNK-CES MICROCATHETERS |
Device Problems
Premature Activation (1484); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/09/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported by the hospital contact that when inserting the complaint enterprise 2 (enc402300/10535381) into the prowler select plus microcatheter (lot unknown), the physician experienced a resistance at the distal point of the microcatheter and attempted to withdraw it.However, the vrd was deployed in the hub of the microcatheter during the withdrawal.Thus, the vrd was withdrawn together with the microcatheter.Instead, a balloon catheter (type unknown) was inserted and the aneurysm was embolized successfully.The procedure was completed without any delay, and there were no patient injury/complications.The complaint product was new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.No visible damage was noted on the product prior to the event.The compliant product was already discarded.No further information is available.The procedure was the coil embolization of an internal carotid cerebral aneurysm (wide neck) at internal carotid artery.Based on the information, the event was not confirmed.The product was not returned for analysis; however procedural factors may have contributed to the event.The sterile lot was not provided therefore a review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot could not be performed.No corrective actions will be taken at this time.Concomitant medical products and therapy dates: enterprise 2 (enc402300/10535381).Balloon catheter (type unknown).This is an initial/final report.This is 1 of 2 reports associated with 1226348-2015-00058.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the hospital contact that when inserting the complaint enterprise 2 (enc402300/10535381) into the prowler select plus microcatheter (lot unknown), the physician experienced a resistance at the distal point of the microcatheter and attempted to withdraw it.However, the vrd was deployed in the hub of the microcatheter during the withdrawal.Thus, the vrd was withdrawn together with the microcatheter.Instead, a balloon catheter (type unknown) was inserted and the aneurysm was embolized successfully.The procedure was completed without any delay, and there were no patient injury/complications.The complaint product was new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.No visible damage was noted on the product prior to the event.The compliant product was already discarded.No further information is available.The procedure was the coil embolization of an internal carotid cerebral aneurysm (wide neck) at internal carotid artery.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|