• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER; OCCLUDER, TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER; OCCLUDER, TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number GSX0030A
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Sticking (1597)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 10/01/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing records verified the lot was processed normally and all pre-release specifications were met.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported the physician selected a 30mm gore cardioform septal occluder to close an atrial septal defect sized to 16.8mm with fluoroscopy.Following deployment, a slight residual shunt was seen.The physician opted to lock the device to further assess apposition.The device was locked and the shunt appeared to be even smaller than previously noted.As the retrieval cord was removed, imaging noted the device being pulled back into the delivery catheter, indicating the device had not actually locked.The physician rotated the catheter and the lock loop released; however, part of the right disc could be seen in the left atrium.The physician captured the device with a snare but was unable to fully retrieve it into the sheath as the right atrial eyelet was caught at the catheter tip.The retrieval sheath and device were pulled into the femoral vein together when the snare slipped off the device.The physician made several attempts with various techniques and tools to remove the device but was ultimately unsuccessful.After several hours, a vascular surgeon was brought in to attempt a cut down; however, at this time imaging showed internal bleeding from the femoral vein, and the patient was transferred to the operating room for emergency surgery.The device was removed and the vein was repaired.The patient was doing well following surgery and no transfusion was required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The occluder was returned to gore for an engineering analysis.As received, the occluder had several fractures of the frame and damaged leaflet material.The damage to the occluder is consistent with methods described in the event that were used to retrieve the device.Due to the condition of the returned occluder the cause of the reported event cannot be determined.The delivery system was not returned to gore for analysis, and therefore cannot be examined for the cause of the reported delayed lock release.Based on inspection of this device, there is no indication that the reported event was due to design or manufacture of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Type of Device
OCCLUDER, TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
KENDRICK PEAK MPD B/P
4250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86001
Manufacturer Contact
marci stewart
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key5166305
MDR Text Key28882492
Report Number2017233-2015-00719
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/18/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/21/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2017
Device Catalogue NumberGSX0030A
Device Lot Number14226296
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/30/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/30/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age6 YR
Patient Weight28
-
-