(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).A partial udi is being reported because the lot number was not provided.It is indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A photo image was sent with the case and was reviewed by abbott vascular clinical research.With the implant, all you see are the radiopaque markers; therefore, there is approximately 1 mm of implant that extends beyond the markers.The implant length appears to be okay.Regarding the trek balloon, the distal balloon marker appears to be further into the tapers and the proximal marker appears to be more into the working length.Without the implant or balloon dilatation catheter to examine, a conclusive cause for the reported complaint cannot be determined.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the lot number was not provided.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
It was reported that during post-dilatation of the 3.0 x 18 mm implant with the 3.0 x 15 mm nc trek balloon, the implant marker seemed to align with the balloon marker, indicating the marker distance was incorrect.Both devices were used successfully.There was no clinically significant delay in procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|