• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES MEZZOVICO 10MM TI CANNULATED TIBIAL NAIL-EX/375MM; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES MEZZOVICO 10MM TI CANNULATED TIBIAL NAIL-EX/375MM; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04.004.455
Device Problems Sticking (1597); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem Sedation (2368)
Event Date 10/12/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was not implanted or explanted during the surgical procedure.An alternate nail was used.(b)(6).Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to a device marketed in the us.Subject device has been received; no conclusions could be drawn as the device is entering the complaint system.Device history record review: manufacturing location: (b)(4) - manufacturing date: january 31, 2013.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that a connection screw could not be separated from an insertion handle during a surgical procedure on (b)(6) 2015.Per the reporter, several attempts were made with all of the appropriate instruments, but the devices could not be separated from one another.It was necessary for the surgeon to remove the nail and replace it with another.The procedure was prolonged by sixty (60) minutes or more.This report is 3 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.A manufacturing investigation was performed for the subject device.The subject device was returned along with the complained insertion handle and connecting screw.The subject nail was received with a part of the positioning groove in the top part of the nail expanded.This damage could occur during implant or removal of the nail due to lateral movements.The threads of the nail show some wear marks.A functional test of the received articles showed that the devices could be mounted together without any problems.The complaint issue could not be replicated.Unfortunately without more information or x-rays we are not able to determine the root cause which has led to this complaint.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
10MM TI CANNULATED TIBIAL NAIL-EX/375MM
Type of Device
NAIL, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES MEZZOVICO
zona industriale 4
mezzovico CH680 5
SZ  CH6805
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES MEZZOVICO
zona industriale 4
mezzovico CH680 5
SZ   CH6805
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5180106
MDR Text Key29323404
Report Number1000562954-2015-10194
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/27/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04.004.455
Device Lot Number8278848
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/20/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/12/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age35 YR
-
-