• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK ENDOSCOPY CAPTURA SERRATED LARGE FORCEP-NO SPIKE; FCL, FORCEPS, BIOPSY, NON-ELECTRIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK ENDOSCOPY CAPTURA SERRATED LARGE FORCEP-NO SPIKE; FCL, FORCEPS, BIOPSY, NON-ELECTRIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number DBF-2.4SL-230-40-S
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 10/13/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation of the used device was not performed in response to this report because the used product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.Twelve sealed devices were returned from the lot number provided in the report.The label matches the product returned.These devices were received on 10/28/2015 and the evaluation of these devices is still on-going.A follow up report will be generated once the evaluation is completed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusions: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.We cannot adequately determine a root cause at this time because the evaluation of the sealed devices is still ongoing.Prior to distribution, all captura serrated large forcep-no spike are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered remote.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2015 during a colonoscopy procedure on a patient of unknown age and gender, the physician used a cook captura serrated large forcep-no spike.The physician introduced the forceps down the scope, opened the cups and when they attempted to close the cups for a biopsy bite, the cups fell off.The cups were retrieved with a roth net.Another forcep was used to continue, however, it is unclear if it was a different lot number.No harm to the patient and no additional procedures or intervention was required due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation of the used device was not performed in response to this report because the used product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.Twelve sealed devices were returned from the lot number provided in the report.The label matches the product returned.Each of the twelve (12) sealed devices was subjected to a close visual inspection for any abnormalities that could lead to cup detachment.No abnormality was observed in any of the devices.Each device was then inserted into a pfc-130l endoscope in a simulated upper gastrointestinal (gi) position.Six biopsies were taken with each device.No issues were noted during this functional test.A close visual inspection was performed on each device after the biopsies were taken to inspect for any damage to the devices.No damage was observed especially any that could have contributed to the observation of the user of cup detachment.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusions: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the used product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for this observation by the user could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.In addition, due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.The returned sealed devices functioned as expected.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.Prior to distribution, all captura serrated large forcep - no spike are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered remote.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPTURA SERRATED LARGE FORCEP-NO SPIKE
Type of Device
FCL, FORCEPS, BIOPSY, NON-ELECTRIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK ENDOSCOPY
4900 bethania station rd
winston-salem NC 27105
Manufacturer Contact
scottie fariole
4900 bethania station rd
winston-salem, NC 27105
3367440157
MDR Report Key5205623
MDR Text Key30569036
Report Number1037905-2015-00477
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FCL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/05/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberDBF-2.4SL-230-40-S
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/28/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date10/13/2015
Device Age2 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received10/14/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/11/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-