• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH BASEPLATE; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH BASEPLATE; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5572-2800
Device Problems Device Abrasion From Instrument Or Another Object (1387); Device Slipped (1584); Extrusion (2934); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Scratched Material (3020); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 10/13/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The following other devices were also listed in this report: 4.5mm peripheral screw - 24mm; cat# 5572-4524; lot# mnm4m0; 4.5mm peripheral screw - 24mm; cat# 5572-4524; lot# mnekdh; 4.5mm peripheral screw - 24mm; cat# 5572-4524; lot# mnma75; 4.5mm peripheral screw - 28mm; cat# 5572-4528; lot# mnllne; humeral cup - 36mm dia x 4mm thk; cat# 5570-3604; lot# mnj9aw; reunion tsa - press-fit humeral stem 13mm; cat# 5569-p-2013; lot# 2336hx; glenosphere - 36mm dia x 2mm thk 2mm eccentric; cat# 5573-2e-3602; lot# mnj17l; 6.5mm center screw - 24mm; cat# 5573-6524; lot# 1k314k.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
Sales rep reported: dr.(b)(6) notified me of revision he wanted to do on mr.(b)(6).At that time all implants were still intact with no loosening.He again showed me x-rays in (b)(6) which showed loosening and it appeared the screws had come through the glenoid baseplate.(b)(6) 2015 revision was performed and the patient had an infection and all implants were removed and antibiotic cement spacer was inserted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following device was added to this report after submission of the initial report: x3 humeral insert - 36mm x 4mm standard; cat# 5571-s-3604; lot# mnhvrp.An event regarding infection involving a reverse shoulder baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a visual inspection shows the device was damaged around the screw holes.Two of the four peripheral screw holes showed significant damage that distorted the original circular shape to an oval.This deformation allowed the screws to fall through the device without locking.-medical records received and evaluation: all medical records were reviewed by a consulting clinician who found no factors of faulty design, manufacturing, or materials of the components.-device history review: all devices accepted into final stock conformed to specification.-complaint history review: there have been no similar previous reported events for this lot id or sterile lot id.Conclusions: the exact cause of the infection could not be determined because limited patient medical records were provided for review.Additional information such as laboratory results would be required for further review.Based on a discussion with the stryker sales representative, it was noted that the dissociated screws, as seen on the x-ray, were not the reason for revision.The surgeon indicated the screws were causing no pain and no harm; the reason for revision was strictly for infection.Based on the device inspection, it is likely the primary surgeon did not use the required drill guide while prepping the glenoid or the surgeon used a powered drill to implant the screws, instead of using the mandatory manual approach.Both may result in widening of the baseplate holes, which will allow the screw to completely pass through the baseplate without locking.This is consistent with the reported event.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Sales rep reported: dr.(b)(6) notified me of revision he wanted to do on mr.(b)(6) in (b)(6).At that time all implants were still intact with no loosening.He again showed me x-rays in (b)(6) which showed loosening and it appeared the screws had come through the glenoid baseplate.(b)(6) 2015 revision was performed and the patient had an infection and all implants were removed and antibiotic cement spacer was inserted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BASEPLATE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
beverly lima
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5208545
MDR Text Key30688843
Report Number0002249697-2015-03652
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130895
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/13/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/06/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2019
Device Catalogue Number5572-2800
Device Lot NumberMNP6WL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/19/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/13/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-