The following other devices were also listed in this report: 4.5mm peripheral screw - 24mm; cat# 5572-4524; lot# mnm4m0; 4.5mm peripheral screw - 24mm; cat# 5572-4524; lot# mnekdh; 4.5mm peripheral screw - 24mm; cat# 5572-4524; lot# mnma75; 4.5mm peripheral screw - 28mm; cat# 5572-4528; lot# mnllne; humeral cup - 36mm dia x 4mm thk; cat# 5570-3604; lot# mnj9aw; reunion tsa - press-fit humeral stem 13mm; cat# 5569-p-2013; lot# 2336hx; glenosphere - 36mm dia x 2mm thk 2mm eccentric; cat# 5573-2e-3602; lot# mnj17l; 6.5mm center screw - 24mm; cat# 5573-6524; lot# 1k314k.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
|
The following device was added to this report after submission of the initial report: x3 humeral insert - 36mm x 4mm standard; cat# 5571-s-3604; lot# mnhvrp.An event regarding infection involving a reverse shoulder baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a visual inspection shows the device was damaged around the screw holes.Two of the four peripheral screw holes showed significant damage that distorted the original circular shape to an oval.This deformation allowed the screws to fall through the device without locking.-medical records received and evaluation: all medical records were reviewed by a consulting clinician who found no factors of faulty design, manufacturing, or materials of the components.-device history review: all devices accepted into final stock conformed to specification.-complaint history review: there have been no similar previous reported events for this lot id or sterile lot id.Conclusions: the exact cause of the infection could not be determined because limited patient medical records were provided for review.Additional information such as laboratory results would be required for further review.Based on a discussion with the stryker sales representative, it was noted that the dissociated screws, as seen on the x-ray, were not the reason for revision.The surgeon indicated the screws were causing no pain and no harm; the reason for revision was strictly for infection.Based on the device inspection, it is likely the primary surgeon did not use the required drill guide while prepping the glenoid or the surgeon used a powered drill to implant the screws, instead of using the mandatory manual approach.Both may result in widening of the baseplate holes, which will allow the screw to completely pass through the baseplate without locking.This is consistent with the reported event.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available, this investigation will be reopened.
|