(b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
It was reported that during the procedure of an unknown artery, before use, the 10 x 40 acculink ii self-expanding stent system appeared defective.It appeared to be kinked and the handle broke.The device was not used in the patient.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The damage was able to be confirmed.Based on a visual inspection of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.The investigation determined that the damage appears to be due to operational context.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, there is no indication the issue was caused by, or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|