(b)(4).Patient's exact age is unknown; however it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.(b)(4) stent blocked/occluded.(b)(4) stent damaged.According to the complainant, the suspect device has been disposed and is not available for return.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex partially covered esophageal stent was implanted to treat a stricture in the distal oesophagus during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2013.According to the complainant, the patient had been lost to follow up post initial stent placement procedure.The patient presented with hematemesis and was found to have a gastric ulcer on an unknown date in (b)(6) 2015.The hematemesis and gastric ulcer were treated during a laparoscopic procedure and oversew.The physician noted overgrowth at the top of the stent during a gastroscopy procedure and on (b)(6) 2015 a wallflex fully covered esophageal stent was implanted within the indwelling stent in order to create pressure necrosis.During a repeat gastroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2015, the wallflex fully covered esophageal stent was removed from the patient without issue.However the physician noted that both the proximal and distal ends of the wallflex partially covered esophageal stent appeared to have broken down with sharp edges.The physician was unable to safely remove the wallflex partially covered esophageal stent endoscopically.The physician confirmed that the hematemesis and gastric ulcer had resolved.The wallflex partially covered esophageal stent was successfully removed on an unknown date using a combination of open surgery through the stomach and endoscopic techniques.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|